Search for: "art@law" Results 8461 - 8480 of 39,032
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 8:41 am
Contents include:Special Issue: Creative Approaches to Transitional Justice: Contributions of Arts and CultureEditorial NoteCynthia E Cohen, Reimagining Transitional Justice Articles Catherine Renshaw, Poetry, Irrevocable Time and Myanmar’s Political Transition Freddy A Guerrero & Liza López Aristizabal, Images and Memory: Religiosity and Sacrifice – The Cases of Tierralta, Trujillo and Arenillo in Colombia Angela Santamaría, Dunen Muelas, Paula Caceres,… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:50 am by artatlawadmin
  … Read More »16 March 2020 The post 16 March 2020 appeared first on Art@Law. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:50 am by artatlawadmin
  … Read More »16 March 2020 The post 16 March 2020 appeared first on Art@Law. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 5:39 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Included here are the collections of New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and the Museo Frida Kahlo in Mexico, among many others.Take in a show: Broadway has gone dark and so have most concert halls, but New Yorker music critic Alex Ross has compiled links to free online performances by symphonies and other groups in the coming days. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Kristin Bergtora Sandvik
Audiobooks are a great combination with arts and crafts. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:49 am by Stefano Dominelli
Yet, in the Court’s eye, the non-application of the Service of Documents Regulation in the case at hand does not mean that EU law remains silent in general. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm by Thomas J. McSweeney
Very close to the beginning of the treatise, one of the authors tells us that “law (ius).. is called the art of what is fair and just, of which we are deservedly called the priests, for we worship justice and administer sacred rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:49 pm by Stefano Dominelli
Yet, in the Court’s eye, the non-application of the Service of Documents Regulation in the case at hand does not mean that EU law remains silent in general. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am by Florian Mueller
That said, whatever law firm authored the analysis of EU proportionality law for them did a great job. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 6:02 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Law Offices of Norman Gregory Fernandezwww.norman-law.com The post To all clients of The Law Office of Norman Gregory Fernandez. appeared first on Biker and Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 6:02 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Our law firm will remain open during this crisis; however, all law firm employees shall be working from home. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
In concluding that there was no risk, the GC had effectively precluded the need to examine if there was a link between the marks (since one of the cumulative conditions had not been satisfied), and so this was not an error of law as claimed by Tulliallan.However, the CJEU made clear that the manner in which the GC had determined that there was no risk was, an error in law. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton law firm of [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:32 am by Diane Tweedlie
In the communication the Enlarged Board summarized the procedural history of the case, in particular with respect to the use of D46, as follows:"In opposition proceedings the opponents had argued that it was not rendered credible that the claimed invention showed an improvement over the prior art (D21) and, in case it would be found that the improvement was rendered credible by the data presented in the patent and in D11, the improvement was not demonstrated over the full scope of the… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:20 am by Sara Moran
The Patents Court found Emson’s patents for an expandable garden hose obvious in light of a piece of prior art relating to a self-elongating hose for supplying oxygen to an oxygen mask for aviation crew. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 4:19 pm by Odia Kagan
You may process  health data, under art 9(2)(i) GDPR once suitable safeguards are implemented (e.g access limitation, strict time limits for erasure, adequate staff training) Employers have a legal obligation to protect their employees. [read post]