Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 31,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2013, 8:39 am
Supreme Court announced its opinion in six cases, including the highly-anticipated affirmative action ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:25 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
In Teen Rescue v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:18 am
See, Questions and Answers on Secondary Transition 57 IDELR 231 (OSERS 9/1/11); In Park Hill Sch Dist v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:16 pm
See, Questions and Answers on Secondary Transition 57 IDELR 231 (OSERS 9/1/11); In Park Hill Sch Dist v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:56 am
The recent case of Woody v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Again, the bill's effectiveness is triggered by the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
…”Even though the defendants presented “medical evidence” that the injuries to the child’s head and brain didn’t result from the accident, the Appellate Division, Second Department, thought that child’s legal team competently rebutted that showing and that a “triable issue of fact” as to the cause had been raised, thus warranting the denial of the underlying motion.There was no toying with that baby ….DECISIONH. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
Bogner – Indiana Supreme Court Weighs Child Support Modification, May 30, 2015, Highland Divorce Lawyer Blog The post Nordness v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
R (A) v Leicester City Council and the London Borough of Hillingdon [2009] EWHC 2351 (Admin) (only on Lawtel) is an attempt to answer the “interesting question” posed by the Court of Appeal in R (Liverpool CC) v LB Hillingdon and AK (interested party) [2009] EWCA Civ 1702 (noted by us here), namely, whether more than one local social services authority can owe a duty under s.20, Children Act 1989, to the same child at the same time. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:52 am
Justice Brooke in Tomlyn v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
(cited directly from Schaffer v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:16 pm
The case of JP v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Friederwitzer v Friedewitzer and Matter of Francois v Hall held that an award of custody must be based upon the best interests of the child, and there is no prima facie right to the custody of the child in either parent. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:07 am
In the United States and elsewhere, a broad-based “child saving” movement emerged in the late 19th century to combat widespread child abuse in mines, mills and factories. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
Our guidance that we just put out clarified that IEPs must be aligned with the state’s content standards for the grade in which the child is enrolled and in order to make FAPE available, the child’s IEP must be designed to enable the child to advance appropriately in making progress toward his annual goals and to make progress in the general education curriculum based on the state’s content standards for the grade in which the child is enrolled. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:37 pm
" This sweeping ipse dixit was barely plausible in Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Whitelaw v. [read post]
