Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 8481 - 8500 of 112,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 5:12 am by Mark Tabakman
  Now, if pre-shift meetings were also held (and not paid for) then the de minimis argument does not seem that compelling. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by David Klein
The consumer will incur an obligation to pay for the product or service if he/she does not cancel before the promotional period expires. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:05 am by jonathanturley
” The problem is that recent polls show that, while the President has no regrets, the public overwhelmingly does. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:04 am by Chris Seaton
“Night Court” works if the cast meshes well and it certainly does here. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sort of nuanced distinction send chills down the spine of academics and appellate judges seeking cover, but does it matter? [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Author
The first is to look at the real world, at how law functions in reality, what it does in practice and reality, and to pursue legal change that leads to real world effects one is willing to defend normally. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am by SW
It does not address adaptations or other care and support needs. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A proxy for damages claimed by plaintiffs may not be an accurate determinant in predicting settlement outcomes because it does not apply the court-accepted event study methodology to effectively compute potential damages per share. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
"We have a duty to defend the Constitution, and even a public health emergency does not absolve us of that responsibility. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, Defendant Mackey's 43 motion to dismiss the Indictment is DENIED. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:26 am by Holly
How does copyright registration affect my recovery of damages? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
However, the law does specify that the hardship must be "exceptional and unusual. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
However, the law does specify that the hardship must be "exceptional and unusual. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am by Alex Phipps
Defendant did not object to the testimony from one officer that defendant did not answer questions from a detective. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:16 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court treated the application for stay as a writ of certiorari and agreed to consider whether nineteen Republican-led states should be allowed to intervene in the suit to defend Title 42. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
  Pyramid Co. (2d Cir. 2006) (vacating district-court sealing order premised on possibility that "presumption of access" might be outweighed by "defendants' … interests in unwarranted reputational injury" if defendants ultimately won favorable merits judgment). [read post]