Search for: "David S. Nows"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 25,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 10:53 pm
What do we do now? [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:09 pm
During his testimony Coulson, who was then working for Prime Minister David Cameron, denied any knowledge of phone-hacking while he was editing the now-defunct tabloid. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:57 pm
Now suppose that in 2040, a historian told you that the denunciation of “Sarah Palin Republicans” was understood by everyone as a criticism of the hunting of wolves. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 5:49 am
appeared first on Law Offices of David M. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:17 pm
And the Republican Party, as it’s currently constituted and as David Brooks wishes it to remain, is definitely the greater evil. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:04 pm
David Pogue of the New York Times writes about the costs of upgrading to an iPhone 4. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
She did it, she testified at David Sneed's trial in 1986, at his direction. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
But Holmes’s twenty-seven former secretaries, or what would now be called clerks, wanted to turn Holmes’s house into a museum, or to add a garden to the Supreme Court, or to establish scholarships for Harvard law school students.[6] In 1940 a congressional committee formed to figure out how to spend the money called for an edition of Holmes’s writings, to be edited by his former clerk Felix Frankfurter. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
Brimmer, decided today by the Iowa Supreme Court, the majority (Justices Dana Oxley, joined by Justices Christopher McDonald, Matthew McDermott, and David May) concluded that defendant's public trial rights were violated by the complete closure of his trial, including the exclusion of his family (here, just his mother): [T]he pandemic is an overriding interest that supports the court's decision to limit the public's access to Brimmer's… [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
" In comments to Kent's post, David Jenkins stresses that the Randolph opinion's British history is woefully uninformed. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:13 pm
"In comments to Kent's post, David Jenkins stresses that the Randolph opinion's British history is woefully uninformed. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
During those weeks, Ronald and two co-defendants, Calum Jones, 45, and David Boyce, 63, drafted an agreement at the offices of HBJ Gateley Wareing to organise the safe return of the Leonardo, once the £2m had been paid to Ronald's firm. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 am
Weird in any case.Somewhat off topic, but now, it's the topic. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
It's not a crime to take your profits and go home. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:01 am
Decades of disinvestment in the arteries that supply the nation’s economy are now coming home to roost. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
As a result, their estates are now “complete”; they have no physical or virtual items left in the estates and no tasks left to do. [read post]
4 May 2007, 1:30 am
"Are We All Transnationals Now? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
FEC, the First Amendment campaign finance case now awaiting a decision in the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 10:02 pm
This article was co-authored by David Plunkett. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
Now the bankruptcy courts have the difficult task of determining the transferee’s intent when receiving property. [read post]
