Search for: "Doe 35" Results 8481 - 8500 of 17,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Thirty-nine percent think it acts as a deterrent, but 35% don’t believe that it does. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
As a reminder, IPXL held that a single claim covering both an apparatus and a method of use of that apparatus is indefinite under 35 U.S.C § 112, 2nd paragraph. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:30 pm
Does the president serve the law, or does the law serve the president? [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He noted that if the FTC believes it does not have the tools or authority to issue guidelines on privacy disclosures, he would be willing to offer legislation. [read post]
Looking at nature, it does not distribute talent and motivation according to sex, gender, or ethnicity. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:56 pm by Kevin
And then 4,911 residents—35%, but more than voted for any other candidate—voted to put him right back in. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 5:03 am by Jenny Huang
The World Bank ranks Thailand 35 out of 190 countries in terms of its enforcing contracts, tied with Portugal and only three slots behind the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:39 am by Shari Shapiro
  According to Forbes, DOE officials have said that eliminating this program would do away with 20,000 jobs, along with the benefits for the environment. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:32 am
Patent No. 6,777,231 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am by Freddie Whittle
Unusually, the oral arguments continued for 95 minutes, surpassing the standard length by 35. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:31 pm
  In this case, a key issue is likely to be whether the pre-merger price of $35 is the relevant benchmark or not. [read post]
Looking at nature, it does not distribute talent and motivation according to sex, gender, or ethnicity. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Under this theory, only in the very rare case when the advertiser surreptitiously charges an inflated price, which the consumer does not realize he has paid until after money has changed hands, does the consumer have standing to bring a private action. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Stefanie Levine
” ) At present, Federal Circuit case law does not link the definiteness requirement to its purpose, but instead holds that claims are definite if they can be assigned some reasonable meaning. [read post]