Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 8481 - 8500 of 30,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2018, 7:15 am by Richard Hunt
In that case the Fourth Circuit held that the Fair Housing Act pre-empted any state law that might allow an owner to put off all or even part of the liability for design/build failures on a third party. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:20 pm by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:47 am by Wystan Ackerman
Merely because there are millions of persons with mobility disabilities in the United States and it might be fair to assume that at least 40 of them experienced the alleged access issues at the defendant’s restaurants was not enough. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm by Christina Tellado and Deisy Castro
Today, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Troester v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Jones is not up for re-election until 2020, but he represents a deep-red state. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am by H. Scott Leviant
Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question:  Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
The possibilities are endless—reforms could be small, such as adjusting some small but incredibly frustrating problems with Regulations X and Z, to large, such as a UDAAP-related rulemaking process that provides fair prior notice about actual UDAAP standards. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Court advised arbitral tribunals to consider whether there is any real advantage in passing interim awards as a fair means for resolution of disputes should be the principal consideration.On the second issue as well, the Court decided in favour of the appellant. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article’s thesis is that to whatever degree digital media poses a threat of disruption to a common law legal system, this disruptive effect will be more acute in Canada than in the United States or England. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]