Search for: "Federal, Inc."
Results 8481 - 8500
of 57,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4th Circuit CoA Ruled that Federal Employees are Barred from Bringing Title VII Suits in State Court
2 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
In Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:52 pm
(Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
Federal courts “rely on state law to provide the canons of contractual construction, but only to the extent such rules do not interfere with federal copyright law or policy. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
As soon as earth was turned, the site became a potential “point source” under federal law. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:40 am
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 15 Civ. 6309 (DLC), 2017 U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm
And a federal grand jury has joined these investigations. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
This afternoon, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that it filed a complaint in federal court in Washington state against T-Mobile USA, Inc. relating to overcharges to T-Mobile consumers and cell phone service subscribers. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
On July 1, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that it filed a complaint in federal court in Washington state against T-Mobile USA, Inc. relating to overcharges to T-Mobile consumers and cell phone service subscribers. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
A former human resources director of American International Group, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:15 am
Zimmer, Inc., 782 F.3d 649 (Fed. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 3:03 pm
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:27 pm
By Sherri Oslick --- In a case testing the interplay between terminal disclaimers and patent term extensions under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the Federal Circuit, in affirming the judgment of the district court, held that patent term extensions could - nay should - be applied to terminally disclaimed patents, leaving Merck's... [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:29 pm
Pearl River Polymers, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:15 pm
The Third Circuit panel in its decision agreed with three other federal appeals courts: the First, Seventh and Eleventh circuits. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm
It held that the transmission over the Internet of a musical work that results in a download of that work is not a communication by telecommunication: see also Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal then held that "postmerits certification would wrongly give binding effect to a non-binding judgment": Despite 50-plus pages of exhaustively researched briefing covering 30 years of federal and California class action jurisprudence, defendant cannot cite a single case in which a defendant obtained class certification after first obtaining summary judgment against the named plaintiff's individual claim. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:32 am
In Rent-A-Center, West, Inc., v. [read post]
