Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 14,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2011, 6:15 am
Ballew v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
They’d better hope that the state appeals, but they’d also better not count on that happening. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm
An unprecedented cost award on a summary judgment motion recently in Hughes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
In Krishnappa v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
See Comer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
" Twombly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
These factors have not changed since the Connecticut Supreme Court announced them in Scott v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:01 am
Let’s hope the Pennsylvania legislature doesn’t give us any more statutes of that quality. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
We can’t revive expired criminal SOLs, according to the Supreme Court in Stogner v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 6:27 am
” The Hawaiian Journal of History, v. 30, 1996. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
“Pleased to meet you; hope you guess my name. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See Wells v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Writing After Roe made me hopeful for debates about reproductive rights in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
As previously stated, the AmeriKat waits with baited breath for an appeal on this point. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
” The same point was made by Lord Justice Clerk Hope in Househill v Neilson, (1843) 1 WPC 673, 683, one of the earliest subject matter cases, concerning Neilson's invention of the hot-blast furnace, when he noted that the “main merit” of the invention may consist in “the discovery of the principle in science, or of the law of nature, stated in the patent. [read post]
