Search for: "High v State" Results 8481 - 8500 of 35,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:09 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar, the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 has also commenced proceedings, with a hearing fixed for Thursday 5 September 2019. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
However, a New York Times article highlights another virus that is causing a high rate of death among children and the elderly. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm by Neoshia Roemer
Kings County, 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1975) (held that P.L. 280 did not grant land use jurisdiction to States or Counties); Segundo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
On this, the Bombay High Court held in Chandra Kanjappa v Maharashtra: "By the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act of 2005, (Act No.25 of 2005), extensive amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (Code) were introduced. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm by HRWatchdog
At this time, AB 5 is the only legislative vehicle still in play regarding Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 12:29 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court in 1963 handed down the landmark decision known as Gideon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm by Florian Mueller
It's roughly three times as fact-rich as the average opposition brief of this kind that I've seen in high-profile cases. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am by Peter E. Harrell
What’s more, the Supreme Court gutted Congress’s ability to veto presidential actions under IEEPA with its 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
Although the Court did not grant all the fees requested, finding the hourly rate a little high and the hours excessive, the final award was $331,674.35. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:59 am by Podhurst Orseck
Infante of Podhurst Orseck PA and Brian Kent of Laffey Bucci & Kent LLP.Counsel information for Boeing was not immediately available.The case is Avia Capital Services LLC v. [read post]