Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8481 - 8500 of 15,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 1:10 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even so, many cases have challenged, and will challenge, the notion of fair use and its extent, and a recent Federal Court decision looked at fair dealing yet again.The case of Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v York University dealt with with the distribution of study materials to students by York University in the form of Coursepacks. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am by Jay Stanley
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
Federal judges have been relatively lenient on low-level drug offenders when they have the discretion to go that way. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am by Jessica Arons
There are some things we don’t know about the leaked Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Infringement of any of the easyGroup trademarksArticle 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c) EU Trade Mark RegulationEasy CatIf the only similarity between the trade mark and the sign complained of is a common element that is descriptive or otherwise of low distinctiveness, that points against there being a likelihood of confusion (Whyte and Mackay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), [2015] FSR 33 at [43]-[44]).Consequently, there was no infringement of any of the easyGroup… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
 The Supreme Court laid out the basic test in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
As a result, even when copyright protection became available with the enactment of the Statute of Ann in Britain in 1709, the take-up by news publishers was fairly low. [read post]