Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 8481 - 8500 of 120,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
He also noted that Lord Chief Justice’s Practice Direction on live text communications, which drew a distinction between media representatives and members of the public (Practice Direction 6C [pdf]) – a media representative or legal commentator may use live text-based communications without the permission of the court whereas a member of the public must ask for permission. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
Where an s21(4)(a) is used it is worth noting that the second part of the Court of Appeal decision is in fact obiter and so a saving provision that does not show a degree of hierarchy may not be valid. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
US - federal sentencing guidelines Bowles v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lisa Stam
The Eagle v Morgan et al decision came out in March, and is one of the few cases to date that provides some insight as to where the courts may go on social media content. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
The "invisible hand" continues to give us the finger. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
(U.S.S.C., May 22, 2017, Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
I suspect the vote will be close either way.And then the Supreme Court may well take the case up.In short, I suspect this is very much not the last word on this subject.We'll see. [read post]