Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 8481 - 8500 of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Federalism Comes Out As the Winner in Murphy v. NCAA
9 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
RegBlog - http://www.regblog.org/
ASTM v. PublicResource.org: Copyright
18 Jul 2018, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
American Society for Testing and Materials v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Assignor Estoppel Persists — But Only for Claims Specifically Assigned
29 Jun 2021, 8:17 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Minerva Surgical Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
The Supreme Court and Standing
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am by hls
But as the just euphoria over a major civil rights victory at a court that has been quite hostile to civil rights — let us not forget the demise of a significant portion of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
Harvard Law and Policy Review - http://www3.law.harvard.edu/journals/hlpr/
In Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, Supreme Court holds that proof of materiality not required to certify securities fraud class
7 Mar 2013, 11:16 pm by The Complex Litigator
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
The caselaw flaw on raw v. unraw marijuana.
13 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
Belote v. [read post]
Underdog Blog - http://katzjustice.com/underdog/
Recent Headlines Confirm the Inadequacy of the Supreme Court’s Reasoning in Trump v. Anderson
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Restitution, victim rights and judicial activism
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Thanks to this post at Crime & Consequences, I see that earlier this week the California Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
Sentencing Law and Policy - http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/
Collins v. Virginia:  Supreme Court Directs Traffic at the Intersection of the Automobile Exception and Searches of the Home
30 May 2018, 2:06 pm by Shea Denning
The post Collins v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
Lance – If This Is Negligence, Who Needs Strict Liability?
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
  While the majority did cite Wyeth v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
State v. Robinson, the Protective Sweep Doctrine, and Automobile Searches – New Jersey Supreme Court Restates the Standards
3 May 2017, 6:17 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
In State v. [read post]
New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney Blog - http://www.newjerseycriminaldefenseattorney-blog.com/
High Income Child Support – Yigzaw v. Asres
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
YIGZAW V. [read post]
North Carolina Family Law Updates - https://divorce.carolinaattorneys.com/blog/
Host International, Inc. v. Maryland Transportation Authority (Cir. Ct. Balto. City)
13 Feb 2013, 11:38 am
”          The court dismissed with prejudice the majority of Plaintiff’s claims because the procurement laws and regulations the MTA allegedly violated did not apply to the I-95 P3 project. [read post]
Maryland Business Law Developments - http://marylandbusinesslawdevelopments.blogspot.com/
Horacius v Richard, Not Reported in Fed. Rptr., 2024 WL 3580772 (11th Circuit, 2024)[Canada] [Petition granted] [Habitual residence] [Exercise of discretion to order return dispositive]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
” (quoting Ruiz v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Case Brief: M.J.B. Enterprises v Defence Construction
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
Reasoning Justice Iacobucci delivered the unanimous judgment of the Court (Chief Justice Lamer and Justices Cory, McLachlin, Major, Bastarache and Binnie also sat for the appeal). [read post]
Newfoundland and Labrador Construction Law - http://www.adambaker.net
New Judgment: Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Botham v MoD [2011] UKSC 58
14 Dec 2011, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The employers’ appeals were allowed by a majority; employees could not recover damages for loss suffered as a result of a breach of a term in their employment contract as to the manner of their dismissal, unless the loss could be said to precede and be independent of the dismissal. [read post]
UKSC Blog - http://www.ukscblog.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] In Sackett v. EPA, the Supreme Court Cuts Back Federal Regulatory Authority Over Wetlands
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“The Supreme Court is manipulating its own calendar to lock GOP policies in place; Arizona v. Mayorkas, the Court’s new Title 42 decision, appears to be the latest act of gamesmanship by a Republican Supreme Court”
30 Dec 2022, 8:08 am by Howard Bashman
And The Washington Post has published an editorial titled “With latest Title 42 ruling, Supreme Court majority makes a mockery of the law. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Adler on Massachusetts v. EPA
24 May 2007, 5:35 am
In time, however, Massachusetts v. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
Case Study: Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm by ttetting
 Wos v. [read post]
Herrling Clark Law Firm Blog - https://herrlingclark.com/blog/