Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 8481 - 8500 of 22,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2012, 2:40 pm by Francis Pileggi
This matter was presented on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 56(h). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by South Florida Lawyers
The district court subsequently granted Appellees’ motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), holding that the offers left Appellants with “no remaining stake” in the litigation. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am by Bill Raftery
Provides state courts shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of this state, The United States Code, federal regulations adopted pursuant to the United States code, established common law, the laws of this state and rules adopted pursuant to the laws of this state and, if necessary, the laws of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state does not incorporate directly or by reference… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am by Bill Raftery
Provides state courts shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of this state, The United States Code, federal regulations adopted pursuant to the United States code, established common law, the laws of this state and rules adopted pursuant to the laws of this state and, if necessary, the laws of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state does not incorporate directly or by reference… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am by Eugene Volokh
" To be sure, the law was not static; "[i]n the first decades after the adoption of the Constitution," the rule that "truth or good motives was no defense" to libel "was changed by judicial decision, statute or constitution in most States. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
   For decades, Pennsylvania followed a "ne'er the twain shall meet" rule that strictly separated strict liability from “negligence concepts. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm by The Legal Blog
The very same rule was considered by this Court in Gurpreet Singh vs. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Michael Lowe
 Disclosure Duties under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Under the federal criminal procedure rules, prosecutors must comply with the discovery procedures adopted by SCOTUS for all federal criminal cases. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Keith E. Whittington
This issue would not normally matter, but it might matter in this peculiar circumstance. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:48 am
Read Ars Technica coverage here.EU: ISP Filtering Mandate Would Violate EU Law, Court Rules On November 24, the European Court of Justice ruled in Scarlet v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:01 am
Relying on this provision, the Commissioner of Education ruled that a school board may not adopt a policy requiring affirmative votes by more than a majority of the whole number of the board to take official action because neither the Education Law nor the General Construction Law authorizes a board to adopt requirements in excess of those already provided by statute (Miller, 17 Ed Dept Rep 275). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
Directors can pick the most propitious time to propose a matter to shareholders. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:47 am by Jeremy Tyler
It means, rather, that prejudice being a difficult matter affirmatively to prove, it is not required to make such proof. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm by John Lewis
Like the Sixth Circuit in Crockett, the Shakoor opinion found that the mere adoption of AAA rules “did not clearly and unmistakably indicate that class arbitration is a question for the arbitrator. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:56 pm
” This additional requirement represents an expansion of the rule followed by many other circuits, in which courts have rejected collective scienter while still permitting scienter to be alleged based on the knowledge of any identified officer or director, though it appears to correspond generally with the rule adopted by courts in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
6 May 2007, 1:30 am
The number of terms a President could serve was presumably a matter that could be left to convention. [read post]