Search for: "New v. New" Results 8481 - 8500 of 166,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 10:41 am by Administrator
   It’s a new year, and that brings new goals for those in the consruction industry. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:12 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 1959 ruling in Napue v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
A cottage industry of entrepreneurial suit-filing has grown up under the statute but now, in the case of Spade v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
However the recent decision ib DDR Holdings v Hotels.com, in which the patent was found to relate an eligible invention may provide clues (see PatLit post here). [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
New York Slip Op07705 November 17, 2016 Summary Continue reading [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:30 am
But, as the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 1964 decision, New York Times Company v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:56 am by PJ Blount
The first problem is Case concerning the Spacecraft Collision in Outer Space on 26 September 2007 (Lacerta v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
Michigan Lawyers Weekly, The Oakland Press and the Detroit Legal News recently published my letter on Johnson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
Drawing heavily on heretofore unpublished internal papers from the chambers of Justice William Brennan and other Justices, this Article reveals how the 1964 landmark decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
By a majority of 4-1, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the local authority was vicariously liable in respect of abuse perpetrated by the foster parents (applying Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10), and even though the local authority was not negligent in connection with the foster placements. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
This also means, however, that the patent will expire on November 16, 2016 (plus any patent term extension), so Worlds.com is likely trying to maximize their enforceable duration for this patent.The case is Worlds.com Inc. v. [read post]