Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 19,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2013, 1:21 am
The prevalent policy in the United States seems to be that it is fine to spy on the rest of the world as long as Americans are more secure. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:21 am
The court saw through this pretext in Baczkowski and Others v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
The Rough Notes Company, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am
The case, LePage v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:28 am
Or they might be captured by the people that they regulate and choose the interpretation that most accords with their views -- which might be a form of inaction unappealable under Heckler v Chaney. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
After a six-year long court battle, eBay has come out on top. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
The Rough Notes Company, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union can supply the requisite evidence to support a conviction.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:12 pm
Here is an example: 1) On Google.ca, I type in "Dunsmur" and the first thing I get is “Dunsmuir v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:01 am
However, the opinion, People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 4:35 pm
Banks v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
the Supreme Court in Muehler v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:08 pm
People make mistakes. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:32 pm
Snitch rulesThe ACLU Blog of Rights not long ago published a blog post on several interesting subjects related to informants and snitching, including a discussion of " Pearson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 5:15 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union can supply the requisite evidence to support a conviction.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
See People v Helt. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:26 am
Suggestion #6: Make love notes long and confusing: Brevity and clarity make lawyers feel uncomfortable and agitated, much like normal people feel at the DMV. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Powell pointed to a line of Supreme Court cases, beginning with the 2004 case Crawford v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:09 am
How long before a large law firm “own” a legal niche by hosting the definitive substantive wiki? [read post]
