Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 8481 - 8500 of 14,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2006, 3:09 pm
[Point of Law] Economists and scholars file Supreme Court amicus brief calling for federal preemption of state "anti-predatory lending laws" in important Watters v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
United States’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
To support this point, Alito compared Thuraissigiam’s requested relief to the type of relief the Supreme Court previously rejected in a 2008 case Munaf v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Class actions in California's state superior courts went down, while class actions in California's federal courts went up. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:03 am by Joy Waltemath
And while her hostile work environment claim also failed, her Title VII and state-law retaliation claims advanced (Spink-Krause v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:22 am by Kathryn Ray
Builders Firstsource-Southeast Grp., Inc., the court stated in regard to personnel files: “[W]here the files sought are those of employees whose action or inaction has a direct bearing on the Plaintiff’s claims or Defendant’s affirmative defenses . . . personnel files are subject to discovery. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:21 am by Bart Torvik
But as his recent opinions in Alleyne v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
According to the court: “[W]e do not accept the proposition that the ubiquity of cell phones, standing alone, can justify a sweeping search for such a device. . . [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am by gmlevine
Beyonet Services and Stephen Urich, D2000-0161 (WIPO May 12, 2000) (, the Panel stated that “[w]e do not accept that the Complainant’s contention that registration of a domain name which is only to be used for [e-mail and file transfer operations] is in some way improper and constitutes bad faith”). [read post]