Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 41,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2008, 1:43 pm
In Prostyakov v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
Part V: The Role of the Courts in the Application of Law: Judicial Review, Methodologies of Interpretation, and Legitimacy closes the circle by bringing the focus back to the courts and their engagement with law. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
In Arthrex and Collins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:02 am
See Powers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
The protection from federal interference of the internal functions of a state governments is one of the bedrocks of state sovereignty protected by the limitations on Congress’s powers in Article I of the Constitution and the reservation of power to the states in the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 2:52 pm
See Touch of Italy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
With the advent of computer databases in the early 1970s, there was a general uneasiness about the power of the state becoming overbearing. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
By Daniel RichardsonRutland Herald v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:04 am
Pereira v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:46 pm
Social relations are the building blocks of society, and man cannot live in a state of transience. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
Perhaps moving to what some other states (and the federal system) have done: just make the whole thing discretionary.I've always thought that the most powerful way of making an argument -- as well as the most difficult -- is to advance a position in a way that makes the recipient (whether a judge, jury, or whomever) believe that s/he's come up with the right answer on their own. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:07 am
” It states: “Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for an injury caused by a natural condition of any unimproved public property, including but not limited to any natural condition of any lake, stream, bay, river or beach. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:44 pm
Richey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm
Practices Assocs. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
In Geter v, State, 38 FLW D1405 (3rd DCA June 26, 2013) a remarkable thing occurred: the 3rd DCA denied, en banc (legally: the whole bunch), Geter's request to apply retroactively the US Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
Ball State Univ. [read post]
