Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 8481 - 8500 of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
Supreme Court decisions in this area are quite specific with regard to your rights as follows: Lefkowitz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
District Courts “Comparative law,” or “comparative legal systems” most commonly compares vastly different courts, l [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am by Mark Weidemaier
  Both are pending before Judge Analisa Torres in federal court in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
If most people don't check PACER, would a final judgment from a district court be of any help? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 The Legal Question: “Reasonable Technical Assistance” Under the All Writs Act Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
 And Chief Justice Warren Burger once said of him that he could not identify “any judicial colleague more highly qualified to have come to the Supreme Court of the United States than Henry Friendly. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
 And Chief Justice Warren Burger once said of him that he could not identify “any judicial colleague more highly qualified to have come to the Supreme Court of the United States than Henry Friendly. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am by Eric
To me, the ruling shows the judicial efficiency of letting Section 230 clean out state IP laws. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Critics of the incoming Judicial Review and Courts Bill, which will allow first magistrates’ court appearances in some circumstances to become online administrative hearings, fear this could lead to “justice in the dark” and represents “an affront to open justice. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]