Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Case 8:08-cv-02212-SDM-MAP Document 12 Filed 11/19/2008 Page 1 of 17IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDATAMPA DIVISIONWAYNE TOMPKINS,Petitioner,v.CASE NO. 8:08-cv-2212-T-23MAPWALTER A. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
He first claimed that the district court erred in limiting access to classified information to persons with a security clearance. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
As to the first question, the court of appeals recognized that the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
Therefore, the relevant factors weigh in favor of transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:37 pm
" United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
Code, § 5054.)2 In 2006, an earlier version of OP 770 was challenged on Eighth Amendment groundsby Morales in the United States District Court. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
The Massachusetts federal district court granted the injunction, and the First Circuit affirmed. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You… [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
And in perhaps the most influential recent critique of court-led social reform, Ross Sandler and David Schoenbrod used a major IDEA class action, Jose P. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:24 am
He is currently a judicial fellow at the National Center for State Courts, where he is guiding NCSC's National Jury Program. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:31 pm
Case Name: City of Gillette v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:29 pm
The initial Senate version of s.877 also allowed suit in federal or state court, but the final version negotiated with the more lawsuit-averse House of the 108th Congress restricted suits to only US federal District Courts, and now redundantly also granted the relevant federal agencies additional authority to removes suits filed by States to federal courts. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
" The recent Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:53 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 Parker v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Cathel, No. 06-4028 Dismissal as untimely of a petition for habeas relief is vacated where petitioner was entitled to equitable tolling of the limitations period for filing his petition after the district court sua sponte dismissed his original petition for failure to exhaust state-court remedies. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:54 pm
District Courts ruling that the Uighurs be released into the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:44 pm
District Court in Austin, Texas requiring the parties in the case of Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:43 am
In Danny v. [read post]
