Search for: "State v. Save" Results 8481 - 8500 of 11,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The first notified in the Official Gazette, on 28th February, removes the bar on ex-Chairpersons and Members of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) from being appointed to any other position under the Government.[1] The only saving grace is that a cooling period of two years is stipulated for them before getting another appointment. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:19 am by war
Information even if represented in a physical way has never been considered sufficient for patentability save for some material advantage or mechanical effect in the arrangement of the information. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:15 pm by Robert Brammer
H.R.1 [115th] An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 10. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
By Sherry Colb In my column for this week, I discuss the case of Plata v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm by David Bernstein
Imagine, for example, if the ghost of Justice William Day, author of Hammer v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
  The 12th District, in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:13 am by Steven M. Gursten
Comment: How many times have we been lied to in this state by auto insurance companies who have promised vast savings in return for savaging our No-Fault protections and benefits? [read post]