Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 24,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
She provocatively opined by way of obiter dicta in a concurrence that:This case involves a “round trip” journey, travel of the copies in question from the United States to places abroad, then back again. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:25 am
The Supreme Court in Zadvydas, found that indefinitely detaining non-citizens who entered the United States would potentially violate their due process rights. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:22 pm
Other states should follow. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
United States and Moda Health Plan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
“The Jehovah’s Witnesses also are responsible for the landmark opinion in West Virginia State Bd of Educ v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
You can, if you are interested, read more about the United States’ Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the Wikipedia entry you can find here.Guillotte made two arguments on appeal and the Court of Appeals addressed then in what seems to have been the order in which he articulated them. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:18 pm
In many states an opinion of this type would be of no effect, as the purchaser is not required to place a deposit in excess of fifteen percent with the developer. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
Ashley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
This question was first addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Berkemer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm
In this regard, the United States District Court in New Jersey explained in Vital State Canada, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:10 pm
Back in 2006, the 5th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
United States, testing the scope of the First Amendment when words that certainly sound like true threats are made on Facebook by a man after his wife left him. [read post]
