Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 8481 - 8500 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
 For example, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s 2010 budget is just $400 million.[2] While many look to CPB to fund children’s programming (among its many other activities), its entire budget is no more than a quarter of the total amount of U.S. advertising revenue produced by children’s programming from food and beverages products alone: $1.6 billion in 2006 by the FTC’s most conservative estimates.[3] That comparison illustrates the vital importance of… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
We agree with many of the Proposed Regulations and believe they serve important investor protection functions, however we are concerned that some of the Proposed Regulations will not protect investors and will have a deleterious effect on the United States forex industry. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by James Bickford
  And the Boston Globe reported on the responses of states whose laws forbid corporate campaign donations prior to Citizens United. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:27 am by staff@mortgagefraudblog.com
Joseph Miller, 63, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Peter Hartofilis, 33, Flushing, New York, Robert Hofler, 52, Pembroke Pines, Florida, and Steve Vento, 41, Jupiter, Florida, are four new defendants that have been added in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am by Anna Christensen
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Jesus Guerra (Slaw) (TorrentFreak) (Managing IP)   United Kingdom House of Lords gives thumbs up to 3 strikes, site takedown – update on Digital Economy Bill (Ars Technica) (Michael Geist)   United States US General New US broadband internet plan scrutinised; Cybersecurity Bill includes IP (IP Watch) Public Knowledge pleased with copyright language in FCC Broadband Plan (Public Knowledge)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC upholds E D Texas judgment… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Jay Willis
  The Washington Briefs blog also has coverage. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
I take it therefore that part of the strategic purpose of the AQ7 ad, at least on the part of those familiar with the blame game in Washington, was to raise the stakes for Obama administration lawyers. [read post]