Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 8481 - 8500 of 14,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2013, 8:04 am by Venkat
_______Related posts: Ex-Employee's Access/Misuse of Employer Files States CFAA Claim -- Weingand v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Employee’s argument that “mitigating circumstances” should temper imposing the penalty of dismissal from her position rejected Thornton v Edwards-Knox Cent. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am by Kirk Jenkins
Warning, and both found standing for opposition groups’ challenge to an environmental delisting petition in Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  State-law-based rulings in MDLs involve judges in one jurisdiction, like Judge Weinstein in New York in Zyprexa, deciding issues presented by other states’ laws – say whether a failure to warn was causal under Louisiana law. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Common law claim for failure to warn. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm by paperstreet
In a groundbreaking case of first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Hooper v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Laura H. Juillet
Today we take a brief look at a couple of interesting employment law cases from the last two weeks: Anderson v London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority  shows us how not to draft a pay review clause, and HM Land Registry v McGlue looks at when aggravated damages in discrimination cases might be appropriate.Beware of unclear pay clauses The case of Anderson v London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority acts as a stark warning for employers when… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rule of LawSabey v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]