Search for: "v. "
Results 8481 - 8500
of 493,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 10:26 pm
On Dece mber 14, the United States Supreme Court decided DirecTV v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:30 am
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and Others v Coutinho Court of Appeal “An employment tribunal had no jurisdiction to enforce a discrimination compensation award it made to an employee; however, if the employee had entered a county court judgment on the award and the employer still failed to pay the money, then the employment tribunal could link the [...] [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:41 am
British Airways plc v Unite Court of Appeal “It was not appropriate to adopt an over-literal interpretation of a poorly drafted section which might defeat the policy behind the relevant Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
As we noted here, the Ninth Circuit's Judge Noonan (pictured) appended a stinging concurring opinion to the Ninth Circuit's judgment in Corvello v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:50 am
Mildred Loving, a party in the case which brought an end to bans against inter-racial marriage, Loving v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:44 am
Today the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
CL (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2008] WLR (D) 381 “On an appeal by an unaccompanied child seeking asylum, against the refusal of his claim and removal directions, an immigration judge was required to determine the adequacy of reception facilities for the child on return as part of the consideration of [...] [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:34 am
Hussain (Zakir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Evasion of immigration controls for a long time was not in itself a reason for deciding that an applicant, unlawfully in the United Kingdom, should not be allowed to stay. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:53 pm
Today the Supreme Court issued its decision in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:51 am
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in BG Group PLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
The Supreme Court hears oral argument today, January 10, in FCC v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:50 pm
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0574, 2016 MT 113, FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a Reciprocal or inter-insurance exchange, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:32 am
Chartbrook Ltd and another v Persimmon Homes Ltd and another [2009] UKHL 38; [2009] WLR (D) 223 “The admission of pre-contractual negotiations as an aid to the construction of a contract would create uncertainty of outcome in disputes over interpretation and would add to the cost of advice and litigation. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 4:10 am
The Biden administration filed its opening brief on Monday in Biden v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a landmark decision rendered by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the recent case of Iliria S.R.L. v Albania underscores the imperative need for timely justice in matters of international arbitration in the context of a complex and extensive legal battle over the recognition of an arbitral award against Albania in the Albanian domestic courts. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:58 pm
In Friedberg v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:12 am
This month is arbitration month on the ContractsProf Blog, as we focus on Rent-A-Center West v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:33 pm
Past First Amendment Bad Ass Award winner, Paul Alan Levy, points out that the recent Barnes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:50 am
Laroche v Spirit of Adventure (UK) Ltd Court of Appeal “A hot-air balloon was an aircraft governed by the Warsaw Convention on International Carriage by Air 1929, as scheduled to the Carriage by Air Act, 1961 and a passenger in it had to bring an action for personal injuries within the two-year period in article 29 [...] [read post]
