Search for: "*u.s. v. Govern" Results 8501 - 8520 of 41,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 4:21 am
Indeed, its purpose as admitted by the State Department, is not to communicate to foreign governments, but to facilitate communication within the U.S. government about the bearer. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
  The best argument against Judge Kozinski's view of the statute is to respond that all of the things that he says would be criminal under the government's view of the statute aren't criminal at all since the statute requires the specific intent to defraud. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:16 pm
  But on remand, the government ultimately withdraws any objection to you withdrawing your plea. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:55 am by Eric E. Johnson
TweetVenkat Balasubramani at Technology & Marketing Law Blog has a good analysis of U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm by Cindy Cohn
   We sought direct accountability for foreign governments who spy on Americans in the U.S. in Kidane v. [read post]