Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTIONÂ "
Results 8501 - 8520
of 8,653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2007, 12:19 pm
Although it's tempting to fall back on the principle of liberal neutrality, I think it's futile to expect concepts like neutrality or impartiality to do all the work, because the principle of neutrality is overbroad (or at least is capable of being misunderstood as being too broad). [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:57 am
In fact, one argument for my version of originalism is precisely that it allows us to understand the most valuable achievements of American constitutionalism in the past two centuries as reasonable implementations of text and principle rather than mistakes that we are stuck with because it would now be too politically embarrassing to disown them. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:57 am
In fact, one argument for my version of originalism is precisely that it allows us to understand the most valuable achievements of American constitutionalism in the past two centuries as reasonable implementations of text and principle rather than mistakes that we are stuck with because it would now be too politically embarrassing to disown them. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:38 pm
The Yankees were a party to Ludtke, and thus could, in principle, be estopped from relitigating their status as a state actor in a suit against them by a current fan claiming a First Amendment violation. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:18 am
Congratulations to Deans Cynthia Nance (Arkansas) and Frank Wu (Wayne State) for each receiving a Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Association for Affirmative Action. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:02 am
"Many women who are opposed to abortion decline the DS tests on the grounds that they are not actionable information. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:19 am
The ACLU's RealID action center has talking points. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
If they do, or where they have, should it appear that there are more blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, or members of other minority groups on campus than race-blind admissions would bring, law suits might well ensue. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:03 am
Karst's objection is well-motivated, a line of Supreme Court cases refuses to extend the Constitution to our actions vis-a-vis aliens who have not entered the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2007, 12:53 pm
(What makes those actions "unlawful"? [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:21 pm
Rather, consistent application of the principles in focus of free market principles, in conjunction with current antitrust law and policy, will ensure that the antitrust laws remain relevant in today's environment as well as the environment of the future. [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:34 am
The action goes against every principle of intellectual property protection under the World Trade Organization. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:35 am
" He replied, "Your actions. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:21 pm
" This is the same Ira Rheingold who, last year, was aghast at the unfair, if obvious, application of federal preemption principles. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:24 pm
The Ethisphere blog post, as commented on there by yours truly, elaborates on “class action attorneys’ respon[se] to EU's plea to sue companies ‘American Style’”. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:59 am
The law - the MCA - was passed in 2006 and Khadr's actions are alleged to have occurred in July of 2002. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:13 pm
These principles apply to word of mouth marketing, a MySpace profile, a blog, a YouTube video, etc. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:15 pm
Kerry Max Cook, an innocent man who spent 22 years on Texas' death row before DNA evidence exonerated him, spoke at a UT Law School symposium this week and said there are five principle flaws with the American justice system. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 7:24 am
Ironically, in these areas, it's not even crystal clear that we would want a president to be "accountable" to the public in the way described above if that meant that a president would engage in actions that he believed would be harmful to American foreign policy or security interests merely to pander to voters. [read post]
