Search for: "APPOINTMENT OF JUSTICES" Results 8501 - 8520 of 24,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Harry Graver
On Friday, in a 7–2 decision written by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court held in Ortiz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Rather, the prosecution evidence in the trial focused on the allegedly false representations that Mr Sarker made prior to his appointment. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
I only wish, as the government argued, that the Supreme Court had addressed the removal power, which is the flip-side to appointments. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, in an opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
Six of the remaining justices held that the SEC’s staff-level appointments of ALJs constituted a constitutional violation. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:12 pm by Chris Walker
The headline administrative law opinion coming out of the Supreme Court yesterday was no doubt Justice Kagan's opinion for the Court in Lucia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am by Hannah Kris
The decision was 5-4, with Chief Justice Roberts joining Justices Breyer, Kagan, Ginsburg and Sotomayor in the majority. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:48 am by Howard Wasserman
United States, where the Court held that there was no statutory or constitutional violation in having a military officer serve as a judge on a service's Court of Criminal Appeals (which reviews courts martial decisions) while also holding a position as judge on a presidentially-appointed-Senate-confirmed judge on the Court of Military Commission Review.* But the Court split over whether it had Article III jurisdiction to review decisions from the non-Article III Court of Appeals for… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Mark Walsh
Congress specifically authorized the kind of joint appointment on the Air Force appeals court and the military commission, and the appointments clause “doesn’t impose any rules against this kind of dual service. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This makes the second time Justice Kagan has written an Appointments Clause opinion in the past two days. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am by Gillian Metzger
  In a majority opinion for six justices penned by Justice Elena Kagan, the court held that they are. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
In her majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan held that administrative law judges are officers of the United States, not employees, and so they have to be appointed under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
The guide is authored by Michael Edenborough QC - who has appeared in over 275 matters before the UK registry and over 60 appeals before the Appointed Person. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Justice Kagan delivered the Court’s opinion, and the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas, Kennedy, Alito & Gorsuch joined in the opinion. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Constitution’s Appointments Clause. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Judges Were Appointed Unlawfully, Justices Rule”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Friday’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
So, the commission’s ALJ’s are “officers” and must be appointed in the proper way. [read post]