Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 8501 - 8520 of 191,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by Giles Peaker
Vale of Aylesbury Housing Trust Limited v Richens (2020) EWHC 685 (Ch) An appeal of judgment in a possession claim where the status of the occupant was in issue. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
The Race to the Bottom has recently been cited for the first time in a court opinion, the honor having been bestowed by the Delaware Chancery Court in Melzer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:52 am by Walter James
" He also confirmed that from the header other lines could have been connected to send material to the Red River. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Circuit Judge Pauline Newman was mentally and physically competent to remain on its bench, and the judge has not been allowed to hear cases during that time.The 96-year-old told Law360 on Wednesday that she had considered giving up her seat as an active judge on the Federal Circuit before the investigation began, but that the way her colleagues have tried to force her out is making her take a stand on principle. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Taking into consideration the case of Bloomsbury Publishing Group plc v New Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] 1 WLR 1633, Whipple J believed it appropriate to make an order against person(s) unknown. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Romano dealt with the futility of ordering a second trial for rape, after the guilty verdict at the first trial had been reversed for lack of corroboration. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:04 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 74 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New judgment: Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:18 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
”; and that a claimant had not been deterred from carrying on the proceedings was not determinative. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:06 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The respondents’ activities at a stadium (speedway racing) constituted a nuisance owing to noise and, as the respondents had failed to establish a prescriptive right to carry out these activities, the injunction granted by the judge was restored, although it remained stayed because the appellants’ house had not yet been rebuilt after a fire. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This was because “the lawfulness of his detention” had been “decided . . . by a court”, in accordance with that article. [read post]