Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 8501 - 8520 of 16,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
In re Beatrice Foods Co., 429 F.2d 466, 166 USPQ 431, 435-36 (CCPA 1970).The applicant has the burden of proof to establish its entitlement to a concurrent use registration. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, drew support from the court’s opinion in 1962’s Glidden Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Leiza Dolghih
However, unlike patents each co-owner must account to the other owners for any profits they receive. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 17, April 24, May 1, May [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Hard Drive 1 was examined and later returned to March as functional. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Co., 433, U.S. 562 (1977), and Wisconsin Interscholastic Athl. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
It appears to me that the rationale of the Buck and Travelers Indemnity Co. cases, supra, and the implications thereof, are reasonable, practical and clearly lead to the conservation of the resources of both court and litigant. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 12:04 pm by Clark
) ( I note in passing that I've been called an "Enlightenment fundamentalist" by one of my Popehat co-bloggers for my willingness to engage with people outside the Overton window, and, no, he didn't intend it as a compliment; quite the opposite.) [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:51 am by Sean Mirski
The same infirmity underlies the Zivotofsky majority’s citation of Williams and Guaranty Trust Co. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
” Rather than make the parties hash out what that means, the court defines eBay’s obligation to include: the name, last known address, last known telephone number, any electronic mail addresses associated with each account from January 1, 2012, to the date of the subpoena and any logs of Internet Protocol addresses used to access the subject accounts from January 1, 2012, to the date of the subpoena. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 His judgment on the other bits – in particular section 6 and Article 14, Sch 1 Human Rights Act 1998 – is also almost certainly wrong imho. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am by Terry Hart
The En Banc Decision When deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction, a court considers four factors: (1) the likelihood a plaintiff will succeed on the merits of her claim, (2) the likelihood a plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm absent an injunction, (3) the balance of hardships between the two parties, and (4) the public interest. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 13-1496Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioners in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.Issue: Whether Indian tribal courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate civil tort claims against nonmembers, including as a means of regulating the conduct of nonmembers who enter into consensual relationships… [read post]