Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 8501 - 8520 of 16,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 6:45 am by Jeffrey Morgan
Our interview with the partner was scheduled for 2 p.m. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” (see page 25 of the adopting release) With the Supreme Court holding that FOIA exemption 4 does not have a competitive harm condition, it calls into question whether the “competitive harm” standard in Item 601 continues to be appropriate. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:18 am by Ken Lammers
More than 25% of the judicial slots of a particular type (Circuit, GDC, JDR) are empty if the jurisdiction sits in 3 or more counties/cities.2. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:19 pm by Michelle Claverol
On September 2, 2008, the mayor issued a “Promulgation of Emergency Orders and Amended Mandatory Evacuation,” which rescinded the prior evacuation order effective September 4, 2008, at 12:01 a.m. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Thus a $.25 price premium applied to 1 million in unit sales amounts to $250,000 in damages. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
  However, Just Eats shares fell significantly in this competitive space, and in the last 12 months alone, its share price dropped by 25%. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Thus a $.25 price premium applied to 1 million in unit sales amounts to $250,000 in damages. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:11 pm by Emily Theriault and David Gallacher
As we discussed previously, the government routinely exceeds this goal, spending approximately $25 billion in FY 2021 (4.41%). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:35 pm by David
  As Gorant points out, 20 of the 49 dogs were put up for adoption, 25 were placed at various animal sanctuaries (some of which would go onto to become adoptable), and only 2 were euthanized (one due to health concerns, not due to aggressiveness). [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:46 am by Gregory Dell
The Court addressed two main factors in denying Unum’s motion to dismiss the case: (1) what constitutes a “material and substantial” duty and (2) the requirement for objective medical evidence when a policy does not require such evidence in order to receive benefits. [read post]