Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 8501 - 8520 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm by Barry Sookman
Case 36602 (Supreme Court of Canada Summary) PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [2016] UKSC 26 (19 May 2016) CNIL Decision March 24, 2016 imposing a fine of € 100,000 against Google Association des Producteurs de Cinema (APC) v Orange SA, Paris Ct. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 4:49 am by SHG
The scenario is the sort that would make for a great law school argument about the merit of a doctrine taken to its logical extreme, except that the logical extreme actually played out before the 9th Circuit in US v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:16 am by David Hart QC
If the Commission doesn’t think these plans are good enough, it has the power to take enforcement action, which could ultimately result in the UK being slapped with a huge fine. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 3:41 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Additional Resources: National Centers for Disease Control The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R.S. 28-1382 | Extreme & Super Extreme DUI Laws Arizona Governor’s Office on Highway Safety CDC Survey Analysis – How Arizona Stands on Binge Drinking and Drug Use Related Articles: What You Should Know about Arizona DUI Laws Underage Drinking: Arming Influencers with Safety & Prevention Resources 5 Myths v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:37 pm
New York imposes a civil penalty for the parties to the contract, outlining a fine of $500 or less. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am by Marcia Narine
A discussion of the history of corporate criminal liability would be too detailed for this post, but in its most simplistic form, ever since the 1909 case of New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:35 pm by ebcarpenter
When a violation is with or in the presence of an unmarried person under the age of 17 years, the offender shall be fined [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
(3) Whenever a fine is imposed under paragraph (2) upon any officer, director, employee, agent, or stockholder of a person, such fine may not be paid, directly or indirectly, by such person. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Michael Grossman
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am by The White Law Group
  The misleading filings violated FINRA Rule 1122, Article V, Section 2 of FINRA’s by-laws, and consequently, FINRA Rule 2010. [read post]