Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 8501 - 8520 of 37,543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:12 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
., Editor, First Reference In Liebreich v Farmers of North America, 2019 BCSC 1074 (CanLII), the plaintiff brought an action for wrongful dismissal against her former employer and a group of entities she claimed were jointly and severally liable. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:54 am by Kristian Soltes
No-cost listings will become available in the United States next week and elsewhere before the end of 2020, Bill Ready, president of commerce at Mountain View, Calif. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:18 am by Dennis Crouch
But thus far, the major constitutional challenge to the Act in Oil States Energy Servs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
In recent years, these workers have been disproportionately represented by historically disadvantaged groups, including African Americans and other minorities, those without a college degree, and the disabled. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am by Scott R. Anderson, Pranay Vaddi
These requirements grew more demanding as the State Department publicly documented R [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC v Shanbaum  2020 NY Slip Op 30953(U)  April 16, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 158691/2019 Judge: Andrew Borrok is an extreme example of a claim of conflict of interest, inasmuch as the opinion states that the attorney admitted representing two parties at once. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]