Search for: "HOWE v. STATE" Results 8501 - 8520 of 80,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
  The Abstract: Despite the administrative state's vast scope, we know frighteningly little about how it operates as an empirical matter. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Finally, Judges Wojtyczek and Zünd state that the Court’s case law on a politician’s free speech is diverse and complex. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Philipp Stompfe, The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main Is the First European Court to Declare the Achmea Case a Landmark Decision with Significance for All Intra-EU BITS Julien Chaisse & Arjun Solanki, Raiffeisen Bank International AG V Croatia, ICSID Case No arb/17/34 Malcolm Robach & Velislava Hristova, The Renewed Role of States in Investment Arbitration – Report of the 6th EFILA Annual Conference 2021 Tim Maxian Rusche, How to Enforce the Achmea… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
Edward White on "How an Old Tort Became New: The Case of Offensive Battery. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
 The Monomeles Protodikeio: an insider's viewLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by a Greek court, the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon, for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in which the Justices will consider how two provisions of the federal Copyright Act apply to a copy that was made and legally acquired abroad, but then imported into the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm by Guest Blogger
How well the Act’s mechanisms work is open to debate (and must be considered in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:34 pm
In approving this reasoning, the appellate court panel divided 2-1 over exactly how to interpret the Lewis v. [read post]