Search for: "People v. Commons"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 14,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
Kwiatkowski told few people at work that he was gay, but he believed that many people knew. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
The Common Sense Foundation of North Carolina released a study on October 11, 2006 that found that at least 37 people now on death row, 16 people who have been executed, whose trial lawyers would not meet today's minimum standards of qualification. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am
App. 3d 1153, 1161 (2005) (citing People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The common affliction of hindsight bias is a good example. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
Heller held that arms that are in common use for lawful purposes – those chosen by the American people – are protected by the Second Amendment. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
” For my part, this ruling is a step forward in common sense and good application of law. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm
The courts will decide whether cases like Daily Mail v Google and Texas et al. v Google show illegal monopolization of data flows, so as to fall within this special case of market power. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm
., State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm
The latter, in turn, responded to my earlier argument that courts should focus on coercion in Murthy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Since Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
Wardlow and Kansas v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm
(This could happen either if D was planning to kill V all along, if D and V are involved a dispute and D kills V in a moment of anger, or if D and V are involved in a fight that doesn’t suffice to authorize deadly force, but D uses deadly force in any case.) [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
