Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
The school's policy, both the one in effect at the time of plaintiff's activity and an amended one subsequently adopted, limits assembly and expressive activity to designated Public Assembly Areas. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:38 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion in limine to exclude the opinion of plaintiff's damages expert concerning the value of user activations. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
A class action lawsuit was filed this week in a California federal district court against See's Candy alleging that signage in the company's Los Angeles store misled plaintiff into believing that the Valentine's Day Heart Box of assorted chocolates was certified Kosher when in fact it was not. [read post]
16 May 2007, 7:05 pm
"Breaking News: Plaintiffs to File Cert Petition in Crawford, the Indiana Voter ID Case; Why the Supreme Court Should Take the Case. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:44 pm
It is the conventional wisdom that multi-plaintiff litigation (mass actions) provides a superior vehicle for litigating tort claims. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:54 am
The trial court thereafter denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict and plaintiff appealed.In dismissing plaintiff's appeal, the Court stated:"The appeal is dismissed because plaintiff failed to assemble a proper record on appeal, including the trial transcript and the minutes of the charge conference (see Sebag v Narvaez, 60 AD3d 485 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 711 [2009]; CPLR 5526; Rules of App Div, 1st Dept [22 NYCRR]… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:48 am
The § 240(1) cause of action was dismissed because the record established that the impetus for the heavy stone's fall was plaintiff's tripping on ground-level, rather than the direct consequence of gravity. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
Here, this rule was met because Plaintiff confronted W directly with the statement on cross-examination.X’s testimony is permitted only to impeach W’s credibility by showing an inconsistency. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:42 am
.), Judge Richard Gray of the Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas denied a Defendant’s Preliminary Objections to a Plaintiff’s Complaint in a dog bite case. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Certain of plaintiff’s executives then communicated to third parties that the defendant was “a thief and a drug user. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, Plaintiff contends that the letter, "essentially finding" that Plaintiff had violated the employer's policy, is defamatory. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:17 am
.), the court addressed insurance coverage issues relative to alleged business losses by the Plaintiff’s restaurants due to COVID-19 closures. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
Supreme Court denied Plaintiff's petition and Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The court explained that although most of the incidents of which Plaintiff complained were relatively minor, "repeated mocking of Plaintiff's accent and pretending not to understand him, if true, could affect Plaintiff's ability to do his job and create an abusive working environment. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
Supreme Court denied Plaintiff's petition and Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The court explained that although most of the incidents of which Plaintiff complained were relatively minor, "repeated mocking of Plaintiff's accent and pretending not to understand him, if true, could affect Plaintiff's ability to do his job and create an abusive working environment. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas ruled that the Plaintiff’s claims under the Dog Law were permissible. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:47 am
The defendants challenged the plaintiff’s standing to bring this action. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 10:04 am
In the midst of thousands of lawsuits claiming plaintiffs developed ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and other serious health conditions, federal regulators and Congress have issued subpoenas to pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson to seek answers over whether or not the company’s talc-based products pose a risk to the public. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
This immunity paradigm applies not only to jail cases but to any constitutional case involving municipal or governmental defendants.What about plaintiff's challenge to the jury verdict? [read post]
