Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 8501 - 8520 of 85,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am by jonathanturley
Tribe could argue that a claim could be made under a “natural and probable consequences” argument, which has been curtailed in states like California. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:09 am by Marcia Coyle
On the other side, 15 states argue to retain state sovereign immunity. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
Richman noted that in Gundy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm by Jennifer Lynch
The government argued in Moore-Bush that a 2009 First Circuit case called United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:05 am by James Kachmar
The Ninth Circuit recently tackled this issue in AK Futures LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by John Elwood
” Monsanto had argued that FIFRA labeling provisions preempted state tort causes of action for failure to warn. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Naomi Shatz
The case was re-argued and yesterday the full court issued a decision finding for the plaintiffs on both their equal protection and Title IX claims. [read post]