Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 8501 - 8520
of 41,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:17 am
Rule 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which you can find here, allows sending service “by electronic means” under certain circumstances. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:03 am
Code § 666(a)(1)(B); the theft charge was brought under 18 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Here is the court's official summary:Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, J.), dismissing under Rule 12(b)(1) plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:56 am
") AC29404 - State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:41 am
Adding to a series of notable decisions addressing the calculation of loss under the Sentencing Guidelines, see here, here and here, the Second Circuit has ruled in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 7:11 am
And it appears that the recent decision in Percipient.AI, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:46 am
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s copyright infringement and related state law claims. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:46 am
Anderson, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:03 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
In addition, declaratory judgments of non-infringement based on Art.32:1 b) UPCA could be viewed as in breach of the duty to provide ‘full protection and security’ – if this standard is understood as encompassing a duty to protect patents against third party infringements. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:57 am
In Benjamin v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:57 am
In Benjamin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:56 am
" In Angello v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:27 am
” Abney v. [read post]
