Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
First, Goldstein argues, c [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, 732 (8th Cir. 2008): 1) plaintiff was likely to prove any interest the state has in protecting funeral mourners from unwanted speech was outweighed by the First Amendment right to free speech; [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
In the new DNA evidence case, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
So Berg would have to bring suits in all 50 states and the District of Columbia against the Secretary of State in each state. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:08 pm
FPL Group, Inc. (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1349, the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District upheld the dismissal of a public trust enforcement action against the owners and operators of wind turbines in the Altamont Pass area (the “Operators”). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina dismissed the claim, and the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
Bush (District Court docket 04-1166). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
[Not selected for inclusion in the Official Reports, decision affirmed by the Appellate Division, 48 A.D.3d 564]In this action, State Supreme Court Justice Gerald Loehr, in an exercise of judicial discretion, imposed sanctions on Scott L. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
District Judge J. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In 1896, the Supreme Court weighed in once again on the question of race in Plessy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
The district court dismissed all three of their claims for lack of standing. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
So, the District court says that this is trickery, and tricking little people is okay. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Two prominent federal appeals court judges say that Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion in the case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
This is the first case involving the merits of a habeas case since the Supreme Court, in the June 12 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
A single judicial philosophy clearly does not and wouldn't fit all.Ad hoc jurisprudence is the name of the gameIf the Court were ideological, it would be more constrained. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
Gore that "[w]hen elections are close, or a winner must be named in a recount, courts should stay out and let the state election boards function without judicial inteference. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-6 Title: District Attorney’s Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
In analyzing whether Reilly had the claimed First Amendment right, the Third Circuit cited Garcetti v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:36 pm
The case, Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:05 am
It is now being alleged that Mahoney, through his attorney, paid "hush" money to the victim to buy her silence.Locally, we have one judicial contest, GROUP 19, with Yvonne Colodny v. [read post]
