Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 8501 - 8520 of 71,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 835 NYS2d 534 [2007] [internal quotations and citations omitted]). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For that crime, he was convicted on state disturbing-the-peace charges. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 2:15 pm by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to take up Dex Media Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:36 pm by Jeremy Feigelson
  So held the United States Supreme Court on Monday, resoundingly, if a bit uneasily, in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm by Will Baude
The problem seems somewhat analogous to the problem of involving houses or committees of Congress in the administration of statutes that was invalidated in INS v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Meanwhile, various House committees will explore the Federal Communications Commission’s broadband Internet coverage maps, state and local government cybersecurity issues, voting technologies, fintech, federal agency IT acquisition and artificial intelligence. [read post]