Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
See Rutherford v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:57 am
That case, captioned United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am
May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am
“Impacts of an RD-180 loss are significant, and near term (FY14 – FY17) options to mitigate them are limited,” the RD-180 Study Group, sometimes called the Mitchell Report after its chair, retired Air Force H. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Larry Klein v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For followers of Critical Legal Studies, of course, this legalistic critique is fundamentally misconceived: For them, law is simply politics-by-other means: the law/politics divide is pure mystification. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
City of Detroit to the Supreme Court’s 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:05 am
In Whitewood v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:25 pm
However, state officials went to the Ninth Circuit, and got at least a temporary postponement while the panel studied whether to impose a further stay. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:19 am
I reported on this story in my post, Hindin v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:09 am
United States, might simultaneously be at risk of quiet abrogation by the operation of predictive analytics. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
17 May 2014, 9:00 am
The case of Ryan v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
Board broke the back of Jim Crow (kansas.com) Study suggests segregation in Texas schools (kvue.com) The Iconic Photos Taken After The Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Back in February, I noted a provision tucked away in last year’s National Defense Authorization Act: Section 1039, which obligated the Administration to study and report back to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on “the legal rights, if any, for which an individual detained at Guantanamo … if transferred to the United States, may become eligible, by reason of such transfer. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
