Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 8,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Put to death by firing squad, electrocution, and gas, perhaps their personal pursuit of execution made it easier for the USA to stomach a return to a punishment that much of the rest of the world was beginning to abandon.Fourteen US states, and the federal government, resumed executions after 1977 with the killing of a prisoner who had waived his appeals. [read post]
1 May 2025, 6:00 am
is cited in the following article: Dan Maurer, Congress and the Operational Disciplining of the Use of Armed Force, Part II: Rules of Engagement and a “Military-Agency Test” For the Separation of War Powers, 85 Ohio St. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:29 am
” Overton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am
Melanie Zanona, Frank Thorp V, and Garrett Haake report for NBC News. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington at Mount Vernon. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Let us be clear. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am
These goals are rarely achieved with a three-V approach to dispute resolution. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The SEC was authorized by Congress to prescribe rules to regulate the use of proxies "as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Several of us (the Reed Smith side, obviously) recently attended the firm partners’ retreat. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
These mobile lawyers moved across colonial/postcolonial jurisdictions in the course of their practice, and using their lives as an archive helped think across fields that are usually historiographicaly distinct. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
These include useful treatments of individual trials, such as Valerie Hebert’s study of the High Command case, Hitler’s Generals on Trial, and Hilary Earl’s The Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial, 1945-1958. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
Section 22 amends the list of registerable crimes inCorrection Law § 168-so that a defendant convicted of a Sexually Moti-vated Felony will be required to register under Megan's Law.Sections 11, §14 through 17, and 19 of the bill amend variousprovisions in the Criminal Procedure Law, the Family Court Act, andthe Executive Law to ensure thatcertain records will be made available to OMH, OMRDD, the case reviewpanel, psychiatric evaluators and the OAG for use in Article… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
Mollie Smith. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The company’s Wallingford plant contained a production line that used to manufacture resins. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Kassie Smith QC, counsel for several retailers seeking damages from Visa and Mastercard, told the tribunal Monday that her Italian clients are entitled to choose English law to govern their lawsuits. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Firm leadership may openly discuss among its personnel what went wrong; use the underlying violations as an opportunity to teach and instill in all staff the critical importance of professional integrity, ethics, and serving the public trust; and possibly internally sanction, terminate, or suspend the audit partner. [read post]
