Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 8501 - 8520 of 32,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Kisor  v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:00 pm by Ritika Singh
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Kisor  v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by George Bellas
United States that the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a warrant, in most circumstances, to access GPS location information spanning seven days or more from a cell phone user. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Noah Lapidus
United States, concerns the interpretation of the phrase “exceeds authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by Bill Otis
The Supreme Court today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:34 am by admin
We wrote recently that the very recent Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Follow-up to previous posting – Judge Chutkin unsealed Jack Smith’s redacted immunity brief v Trump see The Cornerstone of Democracy, Essentials, October 2, 2024: A compendium of the best reporting and commentary surrounding the pivotal 2024 elections in the United States….What you will find are links, with brief commentary, to work that I believe advances the conversation we should be having about America’s – and the world’s… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:18 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Justice Sotomayor stated that “[o]f course, if this Court’s understanding of state law is wrong, California courts, in an appropriate case, will have the last word. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:11 am
Justice Kennedy had recused himself from this case. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:07 am by Administrator
Within those regulations, they state that these regulations are intended to reflect Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
In what might be one of his last dissents, Justice Stevens pointed out that Supreme Court decisions going back to Chief Justice Story’s 1824 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
On August 29, 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
On August 29, 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:07 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States Case: Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]