Search for: "Weeks v. Weeks"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 66,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Two weeks remain before the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Kisor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
Last week, the Supreme Court summarily reversed a denial of qualified immunity in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:15 pm
This week in “Legislation and the Regulatory State,” I taught General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:31 am
The following is by my colleague Kerri Stone, commenting on last week's arguments in Groff v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:44 pm
US, and Voisine v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an order setting a date for oral argument en banc in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 5:34 am
Last week, Will Baude published a New York Times column arguing that the Supreme Court should postpone its decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:26 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
Last week, the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
Tam (formerly Lee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
That is, until I listened to last week's arguments in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:14 am
Burwell, for our podcast The Week in Health Law (downloadable here). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:15 am
Late last week, the Federal Circuit issued Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
It is also the unspoken theme in Abbott's principal brief filed earlier this week in Therasense Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
I wrote last week that the narrow and fact-specific decision in Lozman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:34 am
Last week, the trial court denied the state's motion to dismiss and... [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:27 am
Oklahoma) One petition was denied this week on 6/27/22: Alexander v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
An opinion from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week affirms a trial court ruling that a jury's $1.6 million punitive damages award, on top of a compensatory award of about $280,000 (a 5.7:1 ratio between punitive and compensatory damages), was excessive, in violation of federal due process principles. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:09 am
The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Three) issued this unpublished opinion last week, reversing a $255,000 punitive damages award against an attorney who was found liable for slander of title based on his improper filing of a lis pendens.The plaintiff cited 13 different items of evidence which, he contended, supported punitive damages. [read post]
