Search for: "v. " Results 8501 - 8520 of 493,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Romano Subiotto QC and Jacopo Figus Diaz (both Cleary) describe Lundbeck v Commission: Reverse Payment Patent Settlements as Restrictions of Competition by Object. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Immigration Prof
This is the latest installment of the ImmigrationProf blog on-line symposium on the Fifth Circuit's ruling on Monday in Texas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:01 pm by Adam Steinman
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:39 am by Immigration Prof
The Supreme Court affirmed by a 4-4 vote the Fifth Circuit's affirmance of the preliminary injunction in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Last month, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its decision in Sandys v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Sukhninder Panesar recently published an Article entitled, Unconscionability, Constructive Trusts and Proprietary Estoppel Culliford v Thorpe, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law eJournal (2018). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:13 pm by Reproductive Rights
MSNBC: Reversing Roe: The GOP’s ultimate abortion plan, by Irin Carmon: It’s been four decades since Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:38 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
This morning at 10:00am EST, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Caniglia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:33 am by sally
O’Beirne v Hudson Court of Appeal “Where a consent order provided for costs to be assessed on the standard basis, the costs judge was not entitled to vary that order or tie himself to assessing by reference to the small claims track. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:47 am by Immigration Prof
Michael Kagan Cross-posted from Notice & Comment, A blog from the Yale Journal of Regulation Last week the Obama Administration filed its opening brief in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:39 am by JA Hodnicki
Chicago Law has posted an interesting paper on The Problem of Measuring Legal Change, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. [read post]