Search for: "Customer's Bank"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 14,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 8:04 pm
This is the biggest gorilla there is in Oregon, the behemoth that makes the big banks look like little corner grocery stores: the insurance industry.This is the industry that supported laws making their products mandatory, and while they were at it, they bought themselves a sweet deal decades ago: Complete and total exemption from the consumer protection laws.It's long past time that we brought them back into the fold and make them answerable to their customers… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:53 am
Tolliver, the Third Circuit upheld a conviction under the CFAA of a bank employee because her accessing of electronically stored information was without any legitimate business purpose. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
For instance, if you sell a computer program for banking, get a banking directory or Google "banks" and start from there. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:08 am
And as for the customer, who would know? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:34 am
Thus, the safety net would only be available to traditional commercial banks and not to the nonbank affiliates of bank holding companies or the parent companies themselves.Second, customers, creditors and counterparties of all nonbank affiliates and the parent holding companies would sign a simple, legally binding, unambiguous disclosure acknowledging and accepting that there is no government guarantee backstopping their investment. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
Madoff Investment Securities (BLMIS) lacks authority to pursue common-law claims for damages suffered by Madoff’s customers. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm
Former loan-level representative Simone Gordon says flat-out in her affidavit that “we were told to lie to customers” about the receipt of documents and trial payments. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Hulu, decided on Friday, the Federal Circuit held that a series of steps for serving ads to customers over the Internet, phrased at a high level of abstraction, was patent-eligible subject matter under section 101. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
Maybe XBRL is just a product that customers (investors, analysts, issuers) have no interest in obtaining regardless of the cost. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:11 am
Manufacturers, to the contrary, take more risk in terms of providing goods to their customers on open account terms, which means on an unsecured basis. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:11 am
Manufacturers, to the contrary, take more risk in terms of providing goods to their customers on open account terms, which means on an unsecured basis. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI), Michael J. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm
Rather, the government alleged that Quattrone obstructed justice in his response to a single email from one of his bank’s lawyers reminding employees of the bank’s document retention policy. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Underlying the appeal is New York’s Uniform Commercial Code and a bank’s liability to a customer when the bank pays a check on a forged signature. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Underlying the appeal is New York’s Uniform Commercial Code and a bank’s liability to a customer when the bank pays a check on a forged signature. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:45 am
The latest lawsuit is the 68th that the FDIC has filed against former directors and officers of failed banks as part of the current bank failure wave. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:45 am
The latest lawsuit is the 68th that the FDIC has filed against former directors and officers of failed banks as part of the current bank failure wave. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:57 am
The FDIC accuses the defendants of having driven off the Bank’s customer base by “increasing credit card interest rates to unprecedented levels. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 10:38 pm
Bird would call customers and give them the false impression that he was working for a bank or lending institution. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
See Preston State Bank v. [read post]