Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That seems to be what happened in Alkhafaji v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:25 am
The Court of Human Rights will give judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom on Tuesday 10 May 2011. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:20 am
I re-watched Episodes IV, V and VI a couple of weeks ago and am certain that: 1) they offer no protection against any of the rebels’ weaponry; and 2) they look awesome. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:52 pm
Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Odone is referring to Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
Pollock F and Maitland FW, History of English law Before the Time of King Edward (The Law Book Exchange 2007 [originally published as 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press 1898]). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
European Union International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 25, 2003, Date-Signed February 1, 2010, Date-In-Force THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Desiring further to facilitate cooperation between the European Union Member States and the United States of America, Desiring to combat crime in a more effective way as a means of protecting their respective democratic societies and common values, Having Due Regard for rights of individuals and the rule of law,… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:27 am
In re Imax Securities Litigation, 2011 WL 1487090 (quoting Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
Case Law: OPQ v BJM – a privacy injunction “contra mundum” And, as always, The UK Human Rights blog has a considered and accurate view. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The case of OPQ v BJM ([2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)) addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
The issue has recently been resolved by the United States Supreme Court in Ransom v. [read post]
