Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
Walker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 am
It is his name that is at the heart of the litigation in J and J Crombie Ltd v Nutter (Holdings) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3459 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mrs Justice Asplin dating back to 11 November. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 11:59 am
Murphy v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
The $290 million replacement amount is 76% of Apple's damages claim in the retrial ($380 million) and 71% of the corresponding portion of last year's award. the new total damages figure of $929 million, which could still (but is unlikely to) be adjusted by Judge Lucy Koh before rendering a final and appealable judgment, is almost 90% of last year's amount. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
This morning, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court handed the Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund a win, reversing the Appellate Court’s decision in Rogers v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:22 am
Moreover, the employees adequately pleaded a claim for FMLA retaliation (Stoler v Institute for Integrative Nutrition, November 18, 2013, Sweet, D). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
The NSA had come knocking. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:21 am
Today, several public figures in Korea amaze me. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales came up with a decision that was as predictable as the fact that the trial judge's ruling was going to be appealed in Starbucks (HK) Ltd & Another v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1465. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Soptra Fabrics Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:06 am
Freedom of information boffins are fixated on Kennedy v The Charity Commission. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Seward,supra note v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In doing so, they cite a 1959 case from the Southern District of New York, Manning v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:36 pm
See, e.g., Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
(my emphasis)[3] It has not been challenged by the [patent proprietor] that example 3 of document D5 […] discloses a process for the oxidation of ethane to a mixture of ethene and acetic acid over a catalyst containing Mo, V, Nb and Au […] wherein ethylene and water are fed to the reaction zone in a relative ratio of 1:2 by weight ([…] 5% v/v ethylene and 10% v/v water). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Elmar Wolf opposed, pointing to a number of earlier French and international word and figurative trade marks. [read post]
