Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 6:09 am
“Confío que la solicitud sea evaluada y aprobada con prontitud y sensibilidad por la Junta de Supervisión Fiscal para beneficio de las entidades sin fines de lucro, que tantos servicios aportan a nuestras comunidades en Puerto Rico”, concluyó Vázquez Garced. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
Sackett v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:16 pm
La gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced expuso sus argumentos para vetar el Proyecto de la Cámara 1945 mediante un veto expreso. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:42 am
California’s attorney general and local-government lawyers can sue facilities that don’t comply with the law; the penalty is a $500 fine for the first offense and $1000 for any later violations. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 2:43 pm
Google’s Forum-Selection Clause Upheld AgainRudgayzer v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:10 am
Amendment VIII: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. [read post]
Federal Court of Appeal’s Decision in Mohr Provides Guidance Under Section 48 of the Competition Act
25 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm
Parties found guilty of contravening section 48 of the Competition Act are liable on conviction to a fine in the discretion of the court, to imprisonment for up to five years, or to both (section 48(1)). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
” Additional proposed changes to the state’s food safety rules include: Removing the 20 days of sale limit for homemade foods — cottage foods — that are not considered a potential public health risk; Removing the restriction on the number of days a Special Event Temporary Food Establishment permit may be valid; Establishing a new fee structure for Temporary Food Establishment Permits — $100 for a 20-day permit plus $5 for each additional day over 20 to a maximum of… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm
Such finality exists in the interests of ‘the stability of legal relations’ (today’s judgment, para. 116; in other words, legal certainty), and thus in the interests of all the parties (ibid.), and ultimately the rule of law itself (see ibid., para. 116 in fine, and Hornsby v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
This office has decided not to file a brief in Snyder v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
” PLF contended that, once the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:16 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Overview Agricultural law is often “law by the exception. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Indicó que en Pueblo v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
Ofcom has decided not to fine London Live after it broadcast a “potentially harmful” interview with conspiracy theorist David Icke, citing the importance of freedom of expression. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
