Search for: "High v State" Results 8521 - 8540 of 35,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2019, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2017, Bonner lost a case in New Jersey state appellate court, Bonner v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:19 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Nicole Cheung
Mongolian Government [2005] EWCA Civ 395; and (ii) Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Lt v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
Because of the high potential for overdose, state and federal legislators have increased enforcement and stiffened penalties related to the use, possession, and distribution of fentanyl. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
This is something I’ve been mulling over for a while, and have sounded off about in conversations, but the ongoing proliferation of housing disrepair claims farmers (and associated solicitors) has pushed me to go public with something of a rant. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:43 pm by Greg Jordan
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., on June 28, 2019, the state’s high court issued an opinion in a Texas breach-of-contract case involving a farmout agreement. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 7:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Second Circuit provides some guidance, finding that the plaintiff, a former Hofstra University employee, states a claim for sex discrimination in the wake of a student's harassment claim.The case is Menaker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
Until New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm by MOTP
Late in the game, the FMC even bought a financial institution (UNION FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, now defunct) outright to have even greater control over the make-money-quick scheme and mix its own harvest of high-interest subprime lemons into the securitization pool in 2017. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
When stakes are high, as they invariably are in the national security context, there’s always going to be sharp elbows and bureaucratic tensions. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlBrackeen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am by Florian Mueller
Defendants argue that "[b]ased on the information Continental provided, both parties agreed that there was nothing to negotiate because Continental stated that it was using CDMA2000, which is not part of the Optis Entities’ mapped holdings. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:23 am by petrocohen
Petro has held this distinction since the State first issued the certification in 1998. [read post]