Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 13,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
In its judgment given today (see Judgment in Joined Cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm
If a placebo is chosen that produces a symptom, say dry mouth, the efficacy of antidepressants v. placebos is almost indistinguishable. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Here is the relevant passage: In this case, Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:18 am
The Court of Appeal in Zullo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:10 am
Today it was the turn of spirits, with Joined Cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Viking's bottles bore a sticky label containing its name and the filling station number, plus another sticky label with all the legal rubric on it. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
” (Article V, §8) ... [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Anybody remember Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
Doubtful (FDA Law Blog) US: Joint citizen petition asks FDA for clarity on off-label use manufacturer-communications (FDA Law Blog) Products Allegra (Fexofenadine) – US: Sanofi settles with Actavis in Allegra suit (Patent Docs) Aloxi (Palonosetron) – US: Roche sues Teva, Sandoz, Dr Reddy over generic Aloxi (GenericsWeb) Amrix (Cyclobenzaprine) – US: CAFC changes course, denies stay of injunction of Mylan’s generic Amrix sales: In re Cyclobenzaprine… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
There is also another dimension that might be labeled "libertarian" v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
Bobby has the scoop on the first case, Al-Jedda v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
One HSI branch in Australia, which describes itself as “the global arm of HSUS,” sponsors a “happy meat” label for which it charges a fee. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:23 pm
For example, a supermarket might promote its own private label brand in eye-level shelf space. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In another we praised the court for being "in sync" with sound preemption principals.The latest opinion, Timberlake v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:49 am
The court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
However, Case C-212/08 Zeturf Ltd v Premier Ministre, seems to cast an interesting light on internet trading. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:07 am
The court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
